How are conflicts or disagreements handled within the system?
Conflict resolution within the Ambassador Program follows decentralised and transparent processes designed to maintain fairness and cooperation. The key mechanisms include:
Promotes self-regulation and responsibility before escalating issues further.
Workgroups or designated mediators help structure conversations to resolve disputes.
Ensures that unresolved disputes do not disrupt system functionality.
List of source Assets, tools or processes:
Ambassador Program Analysis - Miro Board - Miroboard that shows voting results on status of Ambassador Program
BeGIN Interviewers handbook - Google Doc - Detailed handbook designed to help interviewers prepare, conduct, and follow up on interviews effectively within the BeGIN framework
Facilitating Decision Making - Webpage - Webpage with Guidance on how to facilitate decision making
Voting / Consensus / Consent / Decision making in Ambassador Program - Miro Board - Ideation and insights on how we could go about establishing decision making processes
Draft Process for Using New Ideas Budget - Google Doc - A draft governance document defining how the Ambassador Program can allocate its New Ideas budget. It outlines what the funds can be used for, eligibility rules, proposal and decision-making processes, record-keeping requirements, and post-funding reporting. The aim is to enable transparent, fair, and efficient funding of innovative, short-term initiatives or pilots.
WG budget minimums, Q3 2025 budget caps, sentiment survey rankings - Google Doc - Tables and information to change each group budget limits in Ambassador Program
Last updated